4
Puzzle pieces connecting icon

Special Education Students

States use a wide variety of approaches to fund special education, including weighted funding, census-based and resource-based allocations, reimbursement models, flat grants, and supplemental funding for high-cost services. Research shows that increased funding and access to special education services are linked to improved long-run educational attainment, such as higher rates of high school completion and college enrollment, while reducing or removing these supports has negative effects on students, such as higher suspension and dropout rates.

Research

Listen to Julien Lafortune explain disparities in facilities funding:

Coming Soon ...

Research Consensus

Research shows that investing in school buildings, facilities, and equipment—capital investments—improves student achievement, especially if it targets basic infrastructure and high-needs school districts.

Policy Notes

  • About three fourths of facilities funding for schools comes from local funds, disadvantaging lower-wealth communities that have more difficulty raising taxes.
  • Many states offer matching grants for local bonds. While these make it possible for some districts to finance larger projects, they tend to be more beneficial for higher-wealth districts that have the means to approve new taxes. Some states take special measures for low-income districts, which makes it easier for lower-wealth districts to access funding.
  • Twenty-four states that offer a credit enhancement program to help school districts issue bonds. This allows low-income and low-wealth districts to qualify for a higher credit rating, increasing the amount of funding they can borrow at no cost to the state. For more information about these programs, see this summary of the effects of state credit enhancement programs.
  • Eleven states require supermajority votes to pass school district bonds for facilities construction and repair. Lowering vote thresholds for these measures would make it easier for districts in these states to access resources.

Capital Improvements Increased Test Scores and Property Values

Summary

Capital improvements increased test scores and property values

Main takeaway

School capital investments improved student achievement and increased nearby home values, with stronger effects in low-wealth districts.

Biasi, B., Lafortune, J., & Schönholzer, D. (2024). What Works and For Whom?: Effectiveness of Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Summary

Facilities repairs increase attendance, achievement, and local tax base

Main takeaway

Investments in core school infrastructure such as HVAC systems and classroom upgrades improved attendance and test scores while strengthening local tax bases.

Biasi, B., Lafortune, J., & Schönholzer, D. (2024). What Works and For Whom?: Effectiveness of Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Summary

Upgraded school buildings decreased absenteeism and adult crime rates

Main takeaway

Improvements to school facilities were associated with reductions in student absenteeism and long-term reductions in adult crime rates.

Biasi, B., Lafortune, J., & Schönholzer, D. (2024). What Works and For Whom?: Effectiveness of Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Learn more with audio snippets

Listen to Tammy Kolbe discuss how special education funding design shapes student identification, resource allocation, and ability to meet students’ needs.

Explore why the way states fund special education matters for students with disabilities and what happens when funding falls short of actual costs. Learn how different student counting methods, including census-based and identification-driven models, shape school resources, identification practices, and service delivery.

Listen to Elizabeth Dhuey explain the key considerations in funding for special education students.

Explore how special education students are funded differently from general education students, how states allocate additional dollars to cover higher service costs, and how funding design shapes identification, equity, and service delivery.