5
A translation icon

English Learners

With the exception of Montana, every state and the District of Columbia provides supplemental funding for English Learners (ELs) through three primary methods: formula funding (weights, dollar amounts, or teacher allocations), categorical grants, or reimbursements. Research shows that targeted EL funding is linked to long-term improvements in academic achievement and life outcomes for ELs, whereas persistent funding shortfalls and recessionary budget cuts are linked to declining proficiency levels and the widening of achievement gaps.

Research

Listen to Julien Lafortune explain disparities in facilities funding:

Coming Soon ...

Research Consensus

Research shows that investing in school buildings, facilities, and equipment—capital investments—improves student achievement, especially if it targets basic infrastructure and high-needs school districts.

Policy Notes

  • About three fourths of facilities funding for schools comes from local funds, disadvantaging lower-wealth communities that have more difficulty raising taxes.
  • Many states offer matching grants for local bonds. While these make it possible for some districts to finance larger projects, they tend to be more beneficial for higher-wealth districts that have the means to approve new taxes. Some states take special measures for low-income districts, which makes it easier for lower-wealth districts to access funding.
  • Twenty-four states that offer a credit enhancement program to help school districts issue bonds. This allows low-income and low-wealth districts to qualify for a higher credit rating, increasing the amount of funding they can borrow at no cost to the state. For more information about these programs, see this summary of the effects of state credit enhancement programs.
  • Eleven states require supermajority votes to pass school district bonds for facilities construction and repair. Lowering vote thresholds for these measures would make it easier for districts in these states to access resources.

Capital Improvements Increased Test Scores and Property Values

Summary

Capital improvements increased test scores and property values

Main takeaway

School capital investments improved student achievement and increased nearby home values, with stronger effects in low-wealth districts.

Biasi, B., Lafortune, J., & Schönholzer, D. (2024). What Works and For Whom?: Effectiveness of Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Summary

Facilities repairs increase attendance, achievement, and local tax base

Main takeaway

Investments in core school infrastructure such as HVAC systems and classroom upgrades improved attendance and test scores while strengthening local tax bases.

Biasi, B., Lafortune, J., & Schönholzer, D. (2024). What Works and For Whom?: Effectiveness of Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Summary

Upgraded school buildings decreased absenteeism and adult crime rates

Main takeaway

Improvements to school facilities were associated with reductions in student absenteeism and long-term reductions in adult crime rates.

Biasi, B., Lafortune, J., & Schönholzer, D. (2024). What Works and For Whom?: Effectiveness of Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Learn more with audio snippets